|
In the abortion pro-life debate, pro-life arguments against abortion or any pro-life
facts on abortion issues are ignored in the pro-choice media's abortion articles.
Now our weekly pro-life letter to the editor service makes it easy for pro-lifers to
voice a pro-life argument in response to this selected abortion article:
Use the text below to help express your opinion and present a pro-life argument
that the public would not get otherwise. Just copy and paste any or all of this text
into an e-mail or letter to the editor of your local newspaper, add your name and
address (or e-mail) and fire off a quick letter to the editor of your local newspaper.
It's one way you can change hearts to right-to-life in America's abortion debate.
National Right to Life Says No to Abortion Ban
|
|
|
[Your name, address, phone number] [Date]
Dear Editor:
The National Right to Life gave abortion advocates a reason to celebrate when the pro-life organization stymied a bill that would have prevented virtually all abortions in South Dakota. The group’s position that it was not the right time to pass the pro-life legislation led to the bill’s defeat by a single vote in the state Senate.
What does this mean to the pro-life movement? First, it’s time for pro-lifers to transfer their support from the National Right to Life to other pro-life organizations. Second, pro-lifers should not give up!
Abortion can still be stopped in South Dakota. The state has only one abortion clinic, and it can be shut down by steady pressure from pro-lifers.
In addition, pro-lifers can push for legislation similar to the South Dakota bill in their states. State by state, or clinic by clinic, the killing of unborn humans by abortion can be stopped.
[Your signature]
|
|
|
|
