|
|
 11/02/2009 11:08 PM
|
leftsnemesis Member

Posts: 139
Joined: 10/29/2009
|
This is QueenJ's signature line that I'm sure she put a lot of thought into..
Originally posted by: QueenJ
Until every woman, everywhere is able to easily access safe, legal, private, affordable abortions, for whatever reason, at any time, on demand, without interference from outside parties and most importantly - without apology or shame.
Until?.. Until what? Don't leave us hanging, finish your sentence for cripes sake.
Until then your going to what?.. Hold your breath? Refuse to bath? Remain staunchly unlikable? Continue being closed minded and vicious? Hate your own reproductive organs? Stop wiping? Eat paste?
We can only speculate what Meanie Miss Queeny is thinking, if that's the right word.
-------------------------
We say grace and we say Ma'am and if you aint into that we don't give a Damn. -Hank Williams Jr. (Country Boy Can Survive) -circa 1981
|
|
|
|
 11/02/2009 11:13 PM
|
Augustine VP

Posts: 4920
Joined: 03/15/2007
|
Perhaps she should simply paraphrase Jesse Jackson;
"No dead babies, no peace!"
-------------------------
People that support abortion are narrow minded, morally frail, passively cruel, constitutionally weak, emotionally impaired and are in every way, humanly disadvantaged.I AM A PRO-LIFE PERSON!
Edited: 11/03/2009 at 10:14 AM by Augustine
|
|
|
|
 11/02/2009 11:16 PM
|
Billson Junior Member

Posts: 43
Joined: 09/27/2009
|
Honestly. It's an error in sentence structure. It has nothing to do with the issue at hand, and as a writer, I can see the benefit in writing a sentence like that. It forces the reader to think, and adds an ominous flare.
She's wrong for being pro-choice, but if we attack her for these silly reasons, we're being babies.
-------------------------
Because in the absence of certainty, when choice and life are set at each others' throats in their bitter and terrible struggle, there can be only one victor. Life is all.
|
|
|
|
 11/02/2009 11:44 PM
|
saucie Executive Member

Posts: 871
Joined: 09/18/2009
|
Originally posted by: Billson
Honestly. It's an error in sentence structure. It has nothing to do with the issue at hand, and as a writer, I can see the benefit in writing a sentence like that. It forces the reader to think, and adds an ominous flare.
She's wrong for being pro-choice, but if we attack her for these silly reasons, we're being babies.
It's not an attack or even pointing out sentence structure. Just because there are strong disagreements and the fact that Leftsnemisis pointed out her adoration, love, and border worship of abortion does not make anyone a baby.
But, it does make anyone who would write something like she did, very sick, imo.
I don't know how much experience you have in conversing with proaborts, but the ones that frequent here are the abortion fanatics, we're not dealing with your average, garden variety proabort.
-------------------------
A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves. - Edward R. Murrow The first liberal was satan.
Edited: 11/02/2009 at 11:46 PM by saucie
|
|
|
|
 11/02/2009 11:49 PM
|
saucie Executive Member

Posts: 871
Joined: 09/18/2009
|
Originally posted by: leftsnemesis
This is QueenJ's signature line that I'm sure she put a lot of thought into..
Originally posted by: QueenJ
Until every woman, everywhere is able to easily access safe, legal, private, affordable abortions, for whatever reason, at any time, on demand, without interference from outside parties and most importantly - without apology or shame.
Until?.. Until what? Don't leave us hanging, finish your sentence for cripes sake.
Until then your going to what?.. Hold your breath? Refuse to bath? Remain staunchly unlikable? Continue being closed minded and vicious? Hate your own reproductive organs? Stop wiping? Eat paste?
We can only speculate what Meanie Miss Queeny is thinking, if that's the right word.
Her signature line says it all...she's an abortion worshiper, she's not here to "debate", she's here to flaunt her adoration of abortion. We're dealing with the sickest of the sick on this site when it comes to proaborts and queenofnothing is no exception.
-------------------------
A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves. - Edward R. Murrow The first liberal was satan.
|
|
|
|
 11/03/2009 01:20 AM
|
Shenanigans Senior Executive

Posts: 1972
Joined: 02/05/2009
|
I'm more concerned with the fact she is grossly uninformed about abortion, medicine, psychology, women's health, semantics in the abortion terms and debate then with any grammatical quirks she may roll out whilst typing on the internet. Lord knows I don't care about my many spelling errs or a comma in the wrong place.
But it is very scary that she's so open about unimpeded killing of innocent human beings based on their physical location.
-------------------------
Cannot unsee.
Know Rule 34.
|
|
|
|
 11/03/2009 01:22 AM
|
Teresa18 Senior Executive

Posts: 1820
Joined: 12/05/2006
|
What that signature says to me is that she supports unlimited access to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. Heck, why stop there? I bet she agrees with Obama and opposes the Born Alive Infant Protection Act.
How to accomplish her "goal"? First, I suppose there must be abortion clinics in every city and town across America. If that is not possible, there must be buses that transport women to the nearest clinics. These buses would be like the freight cars used to drive the prisoners to the Nazi concentration camps. Easier yet, why not force all doctors to perform abortions? Nurse practitioners could even be trained. The government could subsidize all abortions no questions asked with taxpayer money.
Why do I elaborate about what she and fellow pro-aborts would have to do to accomplish such "goal"? Merely to show the absurdity of such a "goal". The above would have to be done, broadening abortion and bringing it to every community across America. Her "goal" is to spread the culture of death. Remember, these are the same people that jump up and down saying that they want abortion to be "safe, legal, and rare". Does her "goal" sound anything like "safe, legal, and rare" to you? What it will do is expand the number of abortions. And that, my friends, is the real goal. They don't believe that a person worthy of life is killed during an abortion. They compare this life lost to having a wart removed or getting a cavity filled! They think abortion is in effect a good procedure. Why make a good procedure "safe, legal, and rare"?
-------------------------
"To those who cite the First Amendment as reason for excluding God from more and more of our institutions and everyday life, may I just say: The First Amendment of the Constitution was not written to protect the people of this country from religious values; it was written to protect religious values from government tyranny." "If we ever forget that we are One Nation Under God, then we will be a Nation gone under." - Ronald Reagan
Edited: 11/03/2009 at 01:24 AM by Teresa18
|
|
|
|
 11/03/2009 08:16 AM
|
leftsnemesis Member

Posts: 139
Joined: 10/29/2009
|
Originally posted by: Billson
Honestly. It's an error in sentence structure. It has nothing to do with the issue at hand, and as a writer, I can see the benefit in writing a sentence like that. It forces the reader to think, and adds an ominous flare.
She's wrong for being pro-choice, but if we attack her for these silly reasons, we're being babies.
You know BS, can I call you BS?, anyway, BS, you don't have to respond to every post. Perhaps instead of finding yourself in a situation where you are casting aspersions at someone you know nothing about and defending someone who does not need your help or deserves defending, you should mind your own business.
Additionally, since you feel so strongly about keeping to the subject at hand, (who appointed you the forum Sheriff?), then perhaps you might take your own advise. I find it interesting that you are a writer and a pro-lifer. Most writers don't really do anything for a living, (except make little marks on paper), or produce any real values for the society at large, therefore, they are usually liberal minded underachievers and most liberal minded underachievers are usually pro-abortion. Odd that! We best keep an eye on you mister, you may be a plant.
So, you say you can see the benefit of writing a sentence like that.. WRONG!
This is not a poetry forum and there is no licence for erroneous sentence structure. I am disappointed to see a so called, self labeled "writer" support poor English usage. Someone aught to take your #2 pencil from you. Bad writer, Bad.
Additionally, you are not in charge of discussion protocol. You are in charge of nothing. Do you get that? I will attack her, you, the Devil, your Mom, whoever.. and you have nothing to say about it. You think I'm being a baby? First of all, being a baby around here is a dangerous thing to be, what with all the baby killers lurking about and all.. and secondly, you are the only one I hear whining. Wah Wah.
In conclusion, Billson, you should know that if I feel the need for any more lip from you.. I'll get it off my zipper.. and if I want any crap out of you.. I'll just squeeze your head. Better check your shoes Einstien, you may have stepped in something.
Phew.. what's that smell? Can anyone else smell that?
-------------------------
We say grace and we say Ma'am and if you aint into that we don't give a Damn. -Hank Williams Jr. (Country Boy Can Survive) -circa 1981
|
|
|
|
 11/03/2009 08:23 AM
|
saucie Executive Member

Posts: 871
Joined: 09/18/2009
|
^^^^^^
Well said...
Sheesh...just what we need, another self appointed "sheriff".
Either he's a clown or closley related.
They spend their time berating those who defend the defensless, proping up the proabort argument and then wonder why nothing every gets accomplished.
{shakes head}
-------------------------
A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves. - Edward R. Murrow
The first liberal was satan.
|
|
|
|
 11/03/2009 08:35 AM
|
leftsnemesis Member

Posts: 139
Joined: 10/29/2009
|
Augustine, Saucie, and Teresa18 are all spot on.
I mostly agree with Shenanigans except she needs to understand something that I think she's missing.
QueenJ and her irk, are not here for debate. They are here to disrupt our efforts and to discourage us. They are ideologically rigid and are not interested in enlightenment or even basic information exchange. For this reason I will not engage them in a debate. It's a fools errand. The only defense against these invaders is to expose them for the fools that they are. Am I interested in her grammatical accuracy?.. of course not. Am I interested in bringing to light her her intent.. you betcha! Am I interested in attacking her at every opportunity.. you better believe it missy.
-------------------------
We say grace and we say Ma'am and if you aint into that we don't give a Damn. -Hank Williams Jr. (Country Boy Can Survive) -circa 1981
Edited: 11/03/2009 at 08:37 AM by leftsnemesis
|
|
|
|
 11/03/2009 08:59 AM
|
faithman CEO

Posts: 12870
Joined: 03/17/2005
|
Originally posted by: leftsnemesis
Augustine, Saucie, and Teresa18 are all spot on.
I mostly agree with Shenanigans except she needs to understand something that I think she's missing.
QueenJ and her irk, are not here for debate. They are here to disrupt our efforts and to discourage us. They are ideologically rigid and are not interested in enlightenment or even basic information exchange. For this reason I will not engage them in a debate. It's a fools errand. The only defense against these invaders is to expose them for the fools that they are. Am I interested in her grammatical accuracy?.. of course not. Am I interested in bringing to light her her intent.. you betcha! Am I interested in attacking her at every opportunity.. you better believe it missy.
Snicker. Nice to know some one gets it. You can't reason with the unreasonable. And baby killers are the most unreasonable scum bags on earth. Their blood lust has blinded them to reality of womb life.
-------------------------
http://i81.photobucket.com/alb...avater/IamaPerson2.jpg
|
|
|
|
 11/03/2009 09:46 PM
|
Billson Junior Member

Posts: 43
Joined: 09/27/2009
|
Originally posted by: leftsnemesis
Originally posted by: Billson
Honestly. It's an error in sentence structure. It has nothing to do with the issue at hand, and as a writer, I can see the benefit in writing a sentence like that. It forces the reader to think, and adds an ominous flare.
She's wrong for being pro-choice, but if we attack her for these silly reasons, we're being babies.
You know BS, can I call you BS?, anyway, BS, you don't have to respond to every post. Perhaps instead of finding yourself in a situation where you are casting aspersions at someone you know nothing about and defending someone who does not need your help or deserves defending, you should mind your own business.
Additionally, since you feel so strongly about keeping to the subject at hand, (who appointed you the forum Sheriff?), then perhaps you might take your own advise. I find it interesting that you are a writer and a pro-lifer. Most writers don't really do anything for a living, (except make little marks on paper), or produce any real values for the society at large, therefore, they are usually liberal minded underachievers and most liberal minded underachievers are usually pro-abortion. Odd that! We best keep an eye on you mister, you may be a plant.
So, you say you can see the benefit of writing a sentence like that.. WRONG!
This is not a poetry forum and there is no licence for erroneous sentence structure. I am disappointed to see a so called, self labeled "writer" support poor English usage. Someone aught to take your #2 pencil from you. Bad writer, Bad.
Additionally, you are not in charge of discussion protocol. You are in charge of nothing. Do you get that? I will attack her, you, the Devil, your Mom, whoever.. and you have nothing to say about it. You think I'm being a baby? First of all, being a baby around here is a dangerous thing to be, what with all the baby killers lurking about and all.. and secondly, you are the only one I hear whining. Wah Wah.
In conclusion, Billson, you should know that if I feel the need for any more lip from you.. I'll get it off my zipper.. and if I want any crap out of you.. I'll just squeeze your head. Better check your shoes Einstien, you may have stepped in something.
Phew.. what's that smell? Can anyone else smell that?
I could respond with another attack, but that would be pointless.
Writers are hard working members of the community. J.R.R. Tolkien, the father of modern fantasy, was pro-life.
The only thing in that post that I cannot tolerate is your implication that I might be pro-choice. It might be understandable if you yourself did not know what that truly was, but you do. I am not a murderer, and I do not support infantacide.
I made a mistake in trying to keep debates civil because I knew that pro-lifers could win in every truly reasonable debate, and I wanted to demonstrate that. I also made a mistake in what this thread was actually about. I'm sorry.
But you attacked an art I love, resorted to name calling, and implied that I supported a group whose soul purpose was the slaughter of innocents.
-------------------------
Because in the absence of certainty, when choice and life are set at each others' throats in their bitter and terrible struggle, there can be only one victor. Life is all.
|
|
|
|
 11/03/2009 09:53 PM
|
Shenanigans Senior Executive

Posts: 1972
Joined: 02/05/2009
|
Originally posted by: leftsnemesis
Augustine, Saucie, and Teresa18 are all spot on.
I mostly agree with Shenanigans except she needs to understand something that I think she's missing.
QueenJ and her irk, are not here for debate. They are here to disrupt our efforts and to discourage us. They are ideologically rigid and are not interested in enlightenment or even basic information exchange. For this reason I will not engage them in a debate. It's a fools errand. The only defense against these invaders is to expose them for the fools that they are. Am I interested in her grammatical accuracy?.. of course not. Am I interested in bringing to light her her intent.. you betcha! Am I interested in attacking her at every opportunity.. you better believe it missy.
Well, why do pro-lifers come here?
For starters, imagine how boring it'd be without the pro-aborts?
Second, without an understanding through exposure to the pro-abortion mindset and argument, how the hell are we meant to defeat it? I was raised Catholic, went to Catholci schools and my mum took me to Pro-Life rallies when I was a child. WHen I reached uni with the secular mindset, I realised the "Abortion is wrong because its murder and the baby has a soul and God will send you to hell" argument WON'T cut it with a Wiccan Feminist or an atheitist abortionist. I didn't learn how to destory the pro-abort argument by sitting around in safe places talking with other Catholics about how abortion is naughty!
Third, if any Lifer thinks sitting on an internet forum just for other lifers is going to save "babies" then there's something wrong with the gray matter.
If pro-aborts want to rant and rail and insult, let them, free speech, and its funny!
-------------------------
Cannot unsee. Know Rule 34.
Edited: 11/03/2009 at 09:53 PM by Shenanigans
|
|
|
|
 11/03/2009 10:59 PM
|
saucie Executive Member

Posts: 871
Joined: 09/18/2009
|
I frequent a site where the proaborts are booted but quick.
We get alot accomplished...ideas and many other things are discussed and implemented.
This is a forum with pointless banter to be honest.
The proaborts that frequent here are the extreme fanactics, the worst that humanity has to offer, the ones who live the mindset of those in past history that saw a segment of humanity unworthy of protection and life.
We're not dealing with the garden variety proabort.
These vile creatures are here because they want to shove their beliefs down our throats, to throw a monkey wrecnch into the discussion.
They want to distract and divert...Years ago I gave up treating this place like it could hold any meaningful debate.
We don't need those proaborts to make a difference and to win the hearts and minds of people of conscience who are just mis-led.
To think otherwise gives me pause about the "gray matter" that thinks it can be so.
-------------------------
A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves. - Edward R. Murrow
The first liberal was satan.
|
|
|
|
 11/03/2009 11:02 PM
|
Shenanigans Senior Executive

Posts: 1972
Joined: 02/05/2009
|
They why come here?
That's the big question, for everyone of every side, because everyone at some point complains or finds themselves in a bit of a flame war. No one forces anyone to access here, so why come here if its such a pig sty?
-------------------------
Cannot unsee.
Know Rule 34.
|
|
|
|
 11/03/2009 11:12 PM
|
saucie Executive Member

Posts: 871
Joined: 09/18/2009
|
Originally posted by: Shenanigans
They why come here?
That's the big question, for everyone of every side, because everyone at some point complains or finds themselves in a bit of a flame war. No one forces anyone to access here, so why come here if its such a pig sty?
I've been coming here for a long time, several years in fact...I've had a couple of computer crashes along the way, but I'm thinking about three years.
I've also made friends on this board and enjoy reading their posts.
Yoda was a great attraction for me.
Just because I see this place for what it really is doesn't mean I have to give up the things and people I do enjoy.
-------------------------
A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves. - Edward R. Murrow The first liberal was satan.
|
|
|
|
 11/04/2009 08:19 AM
|
leftsnemesis Member

Posts: 139
Joined: 10/29/2009
|
Originally posted by: Billson
Originally posted by: leftsnemesis
Originally posted by: Billson
Honestly. It's an error in sentence structure. It has nothing to do with the issue at hand, and as a writer, I can see the benefit in writing a sentence like that. It forces the reader to think, and adds an ominous flare.
She's wrong for being pro-choice, but if we attack her for these silly reasons, we're being babies.
You know BS, can I call you BS?, anyway, BS, you don't have to respond to every post. Perhaps instead of finding yourself in a situation where you are casting aspersions at someone you know nothing about and defending someone who does not need your help or deserves defending, you should mind your own business.
Additionally, since you feel so strongly about keeping to the subject at hand, (who appointed you the forum Sheriff?), then perhaps you might take your own advise. I find it interesting that you are a writer and a pro-lifer. Most writers don't really do anything for a living, (except make little marks on paper), or produce any real values for the society at large, therefore, they are usually liberal minded underachievers and most liberal minded underachievers are usually pro-abortion. Odd that! We best keep an eye on you mister, you may be a plant.
So, you say you can see the benefit of writing a sentence like that.. WRONG!
This is not a poetry forum and there is no licence for erroneous sentence structure. I am disappointed to see a so called, self labeled "writer" support poor English usage. Someone aught to take your #2 pencil from you. Bad writer, Bad.
Additionally, you are not in charge of discussion protocol. You are in charge of nothing. Do you get that? I will attack her, you, the Devil, your Mom, whoever.. and you have nothing to say about it. You think I'm being a baby? First of all, being a baby around here is a dangerous thing to be, what with all the baby killers lurking about and all.. and secondly, you are the only one I hear whining. Wah Wah.
In conclusion, Billson, you should know that if I feel the need for any more lip from you.. I'll get it off my zipper.. and if I want any crap out of you.. I'll just squeeze your head. Better check your shoes Einstien, you may have stepped in something.
Phew.. what's that smell? Can anyone else smell that?
I could respond with another attack, but that would be pointless.
Writers are hard working members of the community. J.R.R. Tolkien, the father of modern fantasy, was pro-life.
The only thing in that post that I cannot tolerate is your implication that I might be pro-choice. It might be understandable if you yourself did not know what that truly was, but you do. I am not a murderer, and I do not support infantacide.
I made a mistake in trying to keep debates civil because I knew that pro-lifers could win in every truly reasonable debate, and I wanted to demonstrate that. I also made a mistake in what this thread was actually about. I'm sorry.
But you attacked an art I love, resorted to name calling, and implied that I supported a group whose soul purpose was the slaughter of innocents.
So.. you know that pro-lifers can win in every truly reasonable debate?
That little qualifier of yours, "every truly reasonable debate", is where you are deluding yourself. You have zero chance of ever having a "truly reasonable debate with a pro-aborter. This is your youth and inexperience showing through. You have no chance what-so-ever in changing any pro-aborter's mind using logic, rationality or honest debate. You will discover for yourself that they are not interested in logic or reason. However, my esteemed, pro-life, self proclaimed writer friend, you are welcome to try. I am keen to see you work your magic. I anxiously await the miracle that you promise and wish you the best of luck. Onward champion! I'm watching and waiting and I promise to support you and not undermine you in any way. Good luck.
-------------------------
We say grace and we say Ma'am and if you aint into that we don't give a Damn. -Hank Williams Jr. (Country Boy Can Survive) -circa 1981
|
|
|
|
 11/04/2009 08:42 AM
|
faithman CEO

Posts: 12870
Joined: 03/17/2005
|
Originally posted by: leftsnemesis
Originally posted by: Billson
Originally posted by: leftsnemesis
Originally posted by: Billson
Honestly. It's an error in sentence structure. It has nothing to do with the issue at hand, and as a writer, I can see the benefit in writing a sentence like that. It forces the reader to think, and adds an ominous flare.
She's wrong for being pro-choice, but if we attack her for these silly reasons, we're being babies.
You know BS, can I call you BS?, anyway, BS, you don't have to respond to every post. Perhaps instead of finding yourself in a situation where you are casting aspersions at someone you know nothing about and defending someone who does not need your help or deserves defending, you should mind your own business.
Additionally, since you feel so strongly about keeping to the subject at hand, (who appointed you the forum Sheriff?), then perhaps you might take your own advise. I find it interesting that you are a writer and a pro-lifer. Most writers don't really do anything for a living, (except make little marks on paper), or produce any real values for the society at large, therefore, they are usually liberal minded underachievers and most liberal minded underachievers are usually pro-abortion. Odd that! We best keep an eye on you mister, you may be a plant.
So, you say you can see the benefit of writing a sentence like that.. WRONG!
This is not a poetry forum and there is no licence for erroneous sentence structure. I am disappointed to see a so called, self labeled "writer" support poor English usage. Someone aught to take your #2 pencil from you. Bad writer, Bad.
Additionally, you are not in charge of discussion protocol. You are in charge of nothing. Do you get that? I will attack her, you, the Devil, your Mom, whoever.. and you have nothing to say about it. You think I'm being a baby? First of all, being a baby around here is a dangerous thing to be, what with all the baby killers lurking about and all.. and secondly, you are the only one I hear whining. Wah Wah.
In conclusion, Billson, you should know that if I feel the need for any more lip from you.. I'll get it off my zipper.. and if I want any crap out of you.. I'll just squeeze your head. Better check your shoes Einstien, you may have stepped in something.
Phew.. what's that smell? Can anyone else smell that?
I could respond with another attack, but that would be pointless.
Writers are hard working members of the community. J.R.R. Tolkien, the father of modern fantasy, was pro-life.
The only thing in that post that I cannot tolerate is your implication that I might be pro-choice. It might be understandable if you yourself did not know what that truly was, but you do. I am not a murderer, and I do not support infantacide.
I made a mistake in trying to keep debates civil because I knew that pro-lifers could win in every truly reasonable debate, and I wanted to demonstrate that. I also made a mistake in what this thread was actually about. I'm sorry.
But you attacked an art I love, resorted to name calling, and implied that I supported a group whose soul purpose was the slaughter of innocents.
So.. you know that pro-lifers can win in every truly reasonable debate?
That little qualifier of yours, "every truly reasonable debate", is where you are deluding yourself. You have zero chance of ever having a "truly reasonable debate with a pro-aborter. This is your youth and inexperience showing through. You have no chance what-so-ever in changing any pro-aborter's mind using logic, rationality or honest debate. You will discover for yourself that they are not interested in logic or reason. However, my esteemed, pro-life, self proclaimed writer friend, you are welcome to try. I am keen to see you work your magic. I anxiously await the miracle that you promise and wish you the best of luck. Onward champion! I'm watching and waiting and I promise to support you and not undermine you in any way. Good luck.
Aren't poly anna's cute? Only prob is they are in way over their little star struck heads in this life and death struggle. The only time a killer becomes reasonable is when they are defeated and subdued. You can not play nice with the cold blooded, and ever expect to defend the innocent. The killers made their "choice". Now they must reap the consequence, or the womb children will continue to die at the hands of monsters.
-------------------------
http://i81.photobucket.com/alb...avater/IamaPerson2.jpg
|
|
|
|
 11/04/2009 02:38 PM
|
nancyu Executive VP

Posts: 5975
Joined: 03/30/2008
|
Originally posted by: leftsnemesis
Originally posted by: Billson
Honestly. It's an error in sentence structure. It has nothing to do with the issue at hand, and as a writer, I can see the benefit in writing a sentence like that. It forces the reader to think, and adds an ominous flare.
She's wrong for being pro-choice, but if we attack her for these silly reasons, we're being babies.
You know BS, can I call you BS?, anyway, BS, you don't have to respond to every post. ...
|
|
|
|
 11/05/2009 06:17 PM
|
saucie Executive Member

Posts: 871
Joined: 09/18/2009
|
So what about it, queenofpoop?
You have a signature line (written in hell) that smacks of illiteracy and leaves us hanging....and you have the nerve to complain about others leaving you hanging.
What is this "UNTIL"...until WHAT????
-------------------------
A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves. - Edward R. Murrow
The first liberal was satan.
|
|
|
|
2773 users are registered to the Prolife America forum.
There are currently 1 logged in.
|