|
We should not have litmus tests for politicians and judges.
That is pure rubbish. A politician could be attractive,
intelligent, experienced and have all the right answers to the
important issues of the day, but if he was found to be a member of the
Ku Klux Klan most people would view that as a litmus test. If a
judge was nominated to the Supreme Court and it was discovered that he
had written a law review article saying women should not be allowed to
vote, that would be a litmus test. If a politician said that the
terrorists who flew airplanes into the World Trade Center had
legitimate reasons for doing so, that too would be a litmus test.
In fact, there are many legitimate and positive reasons for litmus
tests, and people who claim they don’t have any are either lying or
they lack a well-developed belief system. In either case, such
people should never be entrusted with positions of power or
influence.
|