|
The issue is whether we trust women to be their own moral agents.
Among the millions of people in the pro-life movement, the vast
majority are women, including most of its leaders. To suggest
that this female-dominated entity seeks to squash other women, or
doesn’t trust women, would be silly if it were not so
condescending. This is just another shabby tactic the abortion
lobby uses to keep from having to defend abortion.
To understand how truly asinine this “trust women” rhetoric is, imagine
someone opposing laws against rape or incest because he “trusts men to
be their own moral agents.”
Or imagine that a woman is scheduled to have an abortion tomorrow, but
gives birth in her home today. If the baby survives, should she
be allowed to kill it? After all, the child was going to be
killed the next day anyway. Why should she lose her “right to
choose” because of a premature delivery that was completely beyond her
control? Is she only allowed to pay someone else to kill her
baby, but not allowed to kill it herself? Are we saying that we
only trust women to make good moral decisions while they’re
pregnant?
If we are supposed to just blindly trust women, why not trust them
across the board? Let each woman make her own moral choice about
whether to stop at red lights, embezzle money from her employer, write
bad checks, use cocaine, or become a prostitute. Let’s also
exempt all female business owners from discrimination laws which make
it illegal for companies to refuse employment or service to
minorities. In fact, since every law on the books prevents women
from choosing to engage in a particular activity and says that women
can’t be trusted to make that decision, shouldn’t the pro-choice mob be
screaming that women should be exempted from all laws? Do they
trust women or don’t they?
The reality is that the only reason for the law to even
exist is because people – men and women – can’t be trusted to always do
what’s right. Laws are necessary to keep them from inflicting
their immoral decisions on others.
Clearly, this “trust women” rhetoric is a sham. By using the term
“moral agents” to describe women who submit to abortion, the pro-choice
gang hopes to create the illusion that women who pay to have their
children slaughtered do so out of some kind of moral conviction.
It’s just a rhetorical shell-game to make abortion seem morally
defensible.
|